For those who count on satisfaction surveys to measure performance, they are a waste, says renowned business strategist Fred Reichheld. “Glowing customer satisfaction surveys don’t correlate tightly with profits or growth,” he said. “Most senior executives, board members, and investors don’t take them very seriously.”
If Reichheld’s name is familiar, it’s because he is associated with the Net Promoter Score, a loyalty model he developed from his consulting work at Enterprise Rent-A-Car, a St. Louis-based company. Enterprise seemingly came out of nowhere to rise to the top of the rental car industry, surpassing long dueling rivals Avis and Hertz.
When Reichheld began working with Enterprise, he stumbled on their (at the time) novel approach to growing their business. He discovered company executives put their energies into deconstructing positive customer experiences and sharing those lessons with managers across its retail stores. As customers returned their cars, they would be asked whether they would recommend their experience to family and friends.
Reichheld thought the idea so remarkable that he spent the next several years investing his time and energy toward a way of capturing its methods and verifying results in order to develop a similar process that other businesses could use to grow market share. The outcome is what we call the Net Promoter Score (NPS).
As consumers, we should all be somewhat familiar with NPS, when after a service we are asked to rate our experiences. But perhaps less known is why those results are collected, how they are calculated, and their subsequent value to service providers.
The idea for NPS came to Reichheld during an Enterprise staff meeting that he attended on a quest to discover how Enterprise vaulted to the top of the rental market. At the meeting, among their strategies, executives explained how they captured and used positive experiences to share across their retail stores. The surveys asked customers to rate their experience on a (Likert) scale from 1-10, asking “whether they would recommend the service to friends and family.”
Retail managers were responsible for collecting the results and would then throw away any responses that didn’t score a 10. Details from those top surveys were then shared among its 9,000 local retail stores, in hopes, there were lessons in them that other stores could duplicate.
Reichheld set his sights on trying to determine whether there was a correlation between their use of positive customer experiences and the companies’ growth. Discovering that there was a link, he developed “a prescription in a bottle” – NPS – that could be circulated within the business world.
NET PROMOTER SCORE (NPS)
Likert Scale for NPS
The Net Promoter Score differs from a satisfaction survey in that NPS reflects loyalty, while satisfaction surveys reflect someone’s attitude at the time of completing a service. Reichheld’s NPS uses a similar approach to that of Enterprise, asking respondents whether they would recommend the service to others. Respondents are asked to choose one of ten answer choices — from 1, the lowest, to 10 the highest.
Using the Net Promoter Score
Responses 1 through 10 are sorted into three categories: Promoters, Passives, and Detractors.
- Promoters (9s and 10s): Users are intensely loyal and willing to put their reputations on the line to recommend the service to others. These users can be counted on to discuss the service with others and promote its benefits.
- Passives (7s and 8s): This group is somewhat satisfied, but uncertain whether to repeat their experience. They could be tempted away by competing for offers that satisfy the same need. Their lack of enthusiasm will prevent them from supporting the service or service provider, and less likely to discuss it with others. However, these users are not likely to be corrosive by spreading negativity.
- Detractors (0 to 6s): This group is the least likely to repeat their experience and is not likely to take advantage of related, follow-up offers or be tempted by discounts. These users can be fairly negative, whose negativity could spill out beyond one-time experiences, thereby potentially causing the organization harm.
- Add totals for 9s and 10s (x) “Promoters,” add totals for 7s and 8s (y), “Passives”, and Detractors, 0-to-6s (z).
- Normalize the totals by converting the totals into percentages (x/100=%, y/100=%, z/100=%) Then subtract Promoters (x) from Detractors (z).
- Convert the result back to a positive integer. Finally, weight the result using the total percentage of Detractors: If “Passives” exceeds fifty percent of the total responses, add five points.
The score reflects the loyalty of members to the organization, program, or service. Scores are between one and one hundred, with an average score topping out at about 20, which consequently correlates to the 80/20 rule. That rule, also known as the Pareto principle, suggests that 80% of income originates from just 20% of a customer base.
SIGN UP TODAY! Use promo code START and receive a 10% discount.
Learn what makes a service successful. The Apprentice introduces service design, the role of a service designer, some of the popular tools, and includes ideation models for coming up with new services. Click here to sign up »
Learn how to use an Influence Model, a Journey Map, a Blueprint and Touchpoints — the common tools of service design. The Journeyman includes sequential, step-by-step instructions along with case studies. Click here to sign up »
Learn to prototype a service, work with feedback, diagnose service problems, recover services and test and measure user satisfaction. The Master is the only service design course of its type that helps service designers take their designs and completed services to greater success. Click here to sign up »